On Friday 13 November 2015, unknown assailants attacked multiple venues throughout Paris, killing over 100 people in what is now known to be a terrorist attack. As news spread all over the world the hashtag #prayforparis/#prayersforparis started trending on Twitter and Facebook. Shortly after this Facebook released a new profile picture feature which allows users to superimpose the French flag as a watermark onto their profile pictures. Millions of users across the world showed their support of Paris and France in general by adapting their profile pictures. However, some users questioned the validity of this feature and why Facebook has not provided the same functionality as a means to display solidarity in relation to other terrorist attacks in the rest of the world. I am one of these users. I took to Facebook to air out my thoughts after debating this with friends the day after the attacks.
My Facebook status reads:
“So I’ve been burning to say this since yesterday but feared the crucifixion by social media but thanks to a few brave souls I’m going to say it loud and clear…I’m so shocked at the number of people on my timeline who have changed their profile pics to the French flag, while I take nothing (away) from the tragic events I think charity begins at home. Be cognizant of the western media coverage of western tragedies vs the rest of the world. #prayforafrica #prayforsyria #prayforbeirut #prayfortheworld #openyoureyes”
The impetus of my frustration stems mainly from my African friends who changed their profile pictures. To put it plainly, I was in disbelief. Where was the outrage and show of solidarity during the numerous attacks in Nigeria, Kenya, Lebanon and Syria? It seems to me that there is an inherent grief bias, we allocate our grief on the basis of how much media coverage that particular story garners. It is a well-known fact that large media outlets cover terrorist attacks in the west more widely and with more fervor than similar attacks that occur in the rest of the world, however I did not think sitting here in South Africa that a large number of my friends (mostly based in Africa) would jump on the Facebook profile picture bandwagon. While my comments may seem extreme and border on rhetoric, I endeavor to remain unbiased. A few themes emerged from the comments that friends posted in response to my status, one in particular has made me pause and think. Two of my friends posited that although the objections to the profile picture change has its merits, it seems as if that it is only now with the Paris attacks that people remember the Beirut attacks the day before or any other terrorist attacks in the “third world”. How ironic. We are all guilty of grief bias, the closer it is to home, the more media coverage it gets, the more likely we are to wear our hearts on our Facebook sleeves. I’ll be the first to say, guilty. I did not take to social media in protest of the attacks in Beirut, I did not take to social media in protest of the Syrian situation, starvation in North Korea, terrorism in Nigeria etc etc. I didn’t because while I empathise, I am desensitised and it took the reaction of millions to the Paris attacks to realise my own grief bias.
So what is the solution, do we protest for all or protest for none? Is it even possible to protest for all? Can we change the world? So many questions and I have no answers. There’s a constant aching in my heart for the plight of my fellow Africans, this is one of my main motivations to form Mbewu Movement to try make a small change. What I’ve now realized is that I have to live the change on all the platforms available to me. Thank you to those that have allowed me this moment of introspection, we all need it every now and then. The joy I take out of the social media reactions (both for and against and indifferent of the Facebook profile update) is that at least there is reaction and it is strongly against ANY acts of terrorism. There is some semblance of humanity after all.